“Unfortunate Irony Turns Renowned Scientist Into Caregiver For His Wife”

This is a nice article about a scientist who spent years studying Parkinson’s and then became a caregiver for his wife who was diagnosed in 2011 with Lewy body dementia (called “cortical Lewy body disease” in the article).  The wife, a former preacher, had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s in 2004.

This article was published on Flatland (flatlandkc.org), the digital magazine of KCPT Public Television in Kansas City, MO.  My browser did NOT like the Flatland website, which is a shame because there are some photos accompanying the article.  The article was shortened and re-published on NextAvenue (nextavenue.org).  Below, find the text of the original article and links to both websites.

Robin


www.flatlandkc.org/news-issues/cover-story/bill-priscilla-neaves/ –> my browser did NOT like this website

www.nextavenue.org/sad-irony-scientist-caregiver/ –> shorter version of article is here

Faith And Love
Unfortunate Irony Turns Renowned Scientist Into Caregiver For His Minister Wife
By Barbara Shelly
Flatland
January 1st, 2018 at 6:00 AM

Churchgoers at a tidy, white-steepled United Methodist Church in Carrollton, Missouri, heard a frank admission from their guest pastor one spring morning in 2007.

“When asked to preach this Sunday, I almost said no,” Priscilla Wood Neaves told the congregation. “Why? Not because I lacked training and experience, and I have always enjoyed preaching.”

She had, in fact, fought for the right to preach. As a girl growing up in the 1950s in the Texas panhandle, Neaves was told that women could not be ordained ministers in the United Methodist Church. The information was erroneous, but not until she left Texas for college, marriage and motherhood did she encounter a female pastor who could disprove it.

Eventually Neaves graduated from the Perkins School of Theology at Southern Methodist University, became an ordained Methodist minister and hospital chaplain, and gathered a wealth of life experiences to frame her sermons.

And then life dealt a blow that temporarily stilled her voice.

“I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease three years ago,” Neaves told the congregation in Carrollton, “and I have not formally ‘proclaimed the Word’ since then. I guess it was because of feeling a mixture of fear and anger directed toward God.”

Listening in the congregation to the candid and unusual sermon was the preacher’s husband, Bill Neaves. Never entirely comfortable with church and organized religion, he kept a low profile. Few in the country church knew that, while Priscilla was wrestling with her medical diagnosis, Bill was engaged in a professional and political struggle involving the search for cures for diseases like Parkinson’s.

Childhood sweethearts from Spur, Texas, Bill and Priscilla Neaves both packed up briefcases stuffed with credentials when they moved to Kansas City in 2000.

He had been dean and executive vice president for academic affairs at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, a lauded institution where Nobel Prize winners worked with other faculty members to advance science and medicine. She was a chaplain at Children’s Medical Center Dallas — a front-line responder to small patients and their families in moments of fear, relief and overwhelming grief.

James Stowers, founder and CEO of American Century Investments, had consulted with Bill Neaves about a research facility he was creating in Kansas City. He envisioned a place in his hometown where premier scientists would have resources and time to study the causes of diseases and embark on a search for cures. Stowers asked Neaves to be the first president and CEO of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research.

“I was enthusiastic about it,” Neaves says. “Few people want to support basic science.”

But he needed to persuade Priscilla. She had balked at several other moves when opportunities had arisen. After a dinner with Stowers; his wife, Virginia; and other family members, she agreed. Neither Bill nor Priscilla Neaves had any way of knowing that during the next few years his new job would come to involve politics as much as science, and her physical and spiritual health would be put to the test.

Priscilla quickly dived into life in Kansas City by joining the board of directors of the medical ethics research and advocacy group now known as The Center for Practical Bioethics. She also joined the Institutional Review Board for Children’s Mercy Hospital.

The first signs of trouble appeared in the fall of 2003. Priscilla didn’t feel well; something was off, she said. She wasn’t able to walk with her normal stride. When the odd symptoms persisted for a few weeks, Bill tapped his medical contacts.

In January 2004, a physician at the University of Kansas Hospital diagnosed Parkinson’s disease. Another physician at Washington University Medical Center in St. Louis concurred.

As Priscilla noted in her sermon a few years later, the news came as a blow. Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that hinders the brain’s ability to produce dopamine, the transmitter that enables people to regulate motor functions.

Still, the disorder progresses slowly in most people, and Priscilla was accustomed to a busy and productive life. She became a full-time volunteer chaplain at Carroll County Memorial Hospital in 2006 after the couple purchased a farm about 60 miles northeast of Kansas City. In that capacity, she provided spiritual resources and facilitated support groups for cancer and Parkinson’s patients.

Though his wife’s health was a concern, Bill Neaves was ebullient about progress at the Stowers Institute in its early years. First-rate scientists had indeed been willing to come to Kansas City, and they were engaged in rigorous and productive research.

One cloud on the horizon was legislation that kept resurfacing in the Missouri General Assembly. Pushed by Matt Bartle, a lawyer and at the time a state senator from Lee’s Summit, its stated purpose was to ban human cloning. But Bartle’s definition of cloning went far beyond a scenario in which a squawking baby might emerge from a laboratory. His bill aimed to ban even the copying of human embryos as small as a few dozen cells.

Those miniscule lab dish embryos are home to embryonic stem cells that can be formed with a patient’s DNA. Scientists believe the newly created cells can be used to repair tissue, organs and nerves damaged by all manner of injuries and diseases. In the early 2000s, they eyed the laboratory procedure with great hope.

To Bartle and others, it represented a moral threat. That’s because, once embryonic stem cells are harvested, the tiny embryo that sheltered them is destroyed. What some people viewed as a somewhat mysterious lab dish procedure, religious conservatives saw as the willful termination of human life.

The issue made it to the November 2006 ballot in the form of a constitutional amendment that would protect all scientific research in Missouri that was legal under federal law.

Jim and Virginia Stowers spent $30 million to bankroll the campaign supporting the amendment. Opponents formed their own coalition and also raised millions of dollars. Missouri citizens were besieged by television ads alternately lauding the promise of stem cell research and issuing dire, if misleading, warnings about cloning.

Bill Neaves was in the thick of it all. He wrote essays and traveled the state, speaking to groups to explain what embryonic stem cell research meant for science and the Stowers Institute. He touted its potential to stop or slow the suffering from devastating diseases. He mentioned Parkinson’s disease. What he never said publicly was that the person closest to him had been diagnosed with that illness.

The constitutional amendment passed by a razor-thin margin — a difference of 50,800 votes out of 2.1 million cast.

Ultimately, science itself stepped in to bring an uneasy truce. A Japanese researcher found a way to make adult cells behave like embryonic cells, with the same capacity to repair and rebuild damaged body parts. The reprogramming method is less costly than the somatic cell nuclear transfer procedure, and it sidesteps the ethical issues. It is now the preferred avenue for many scientists, including those at the Stowers Institute.

With his wife at his side, Bill Neaves had done his part to stand up for science. But science could not immediately return the favor. It could not stop the frightening changes that were going on in Priscilla’s body.

“For more than a quarter-century, I have retreated each summer to the Beartooth Wilderness on the Boulder River in Montana,” Priscilla Neaves wrote in July 2008. “I relax, enjoy, meditate and relate to God’s magnificent mountains and forests. Perhaps my Native American heritage encourages me to celebrate nature — my paternal grandmother was half Choctaw.”

From the deck of the wilderness home she and Bill cherished, Priscilla wrote of her love of nature, as experienced in Montana, West Texas and New England — all places she had lived. Bill would later include the meditation in a compilation of his wife’s sermons and writings. Soon after that, Priscilla’s illness made further trips impossible. “Mercifully,” Bill wrote in the afterword of the book he compiled in his wife’s honor, “we rarely realize that we are doing a beloved thing for the last time.”

The previous couple of years had been difficult. The couple lost their son, William Jr., in May of 2007. Living in Houston, he had waged a long struggle with alcoholism and died of its complications. “Priscilla was amazingly stoic about it, but I know it must have been incredibly difficult for her,” Bill says now.

She continued her work as a voluntary chaplain and frequently preached sermons in the chapel of Carroll County Memorial Hospital.

“When questions about the meaning and purpose of life hit us like a tornado, God’s grace can be most tangible,” she told her small congregation in 2009. “Job’s way can also be ours. I know. I have been there.”

By this time the Stowers Institute was thriving. Jim and Virginia Stowers had given $2 billion worth of American Century stock to its endowment. Labs were filling up with impressively credentialed scientists. A spinoff biotechnology company, BioMed Valley Technologies Inc., had been formed to move treatments and therapies into clinical development.

In June 2010, Bill Neaves announced he would retire as president and CEO of the institute. He had already begun handing off the day-to-day operations to a protege, David M. Chao.

Neaves talked about wanting more time for research and various projects. He was especially excited about returning to research he’d begun 40 years ago, studying the asexual reproduction patterns of some species of lizards. He didn’t disclose publicly that his family was dealing with an all-consuming illness.

Priscilla’s symptoms were increasingly resembling more of a dementia-type illness than traditional Parkinson’s disease. At the end of 2011, specialists at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, found that Priscilla was suffering from cortical lewy body disease — a brain disorder closely related to Parkinson’s but even more devastating. The destruction proceeds beyond motor control to destroy brain neurons associated with cognitive functioning and movement.

Bill Neaves recalls that his wife absorbed the terrible news calmly. “Priscilla was still pretty much intellectually intact then, and I was very impressed with what she said,” he recalls. “The neurologist said, ‘This is what we have, and it will probably be fatal within a year and a half.’ Priscilla said, ‘Well, glad to know what I’m facing, and I know firsthand that a lot worse things have happened to people than what is happening to me.’”

The couple had moved several months earlier into an apartment in Bishop Spencer Place, a retirement facility in midtown Kansas City that has provisions for nursing care. Linda Yeager, who was chaplain there at the time, remembers that Priscilla sought her out.

“She was very anxious for me to know that she was a minister herself, and she was very interested in helping other people,” Yeager said. “She wanted to share her books, and she wanted to do research and help people. She was greatly respected and loved.”

But Priscilla’s disease was progressing rapidly. By 2012, she was experiencing anxiety, confusion and paranoia. Daily tasks such as routine teeth brushing became a struggle.

On the advice of her family physician, Priscilla moved to a Leawood facility that treats patients with dementia. She became bedridden, mostly paralyzed from the chest down, with limited use of her hands. Once a passionate voice on nearly every topic, she now spoke only intermittently.

For nearly a year, Priscilla was officially in hospice care.

Bill, who describes himself as “a compulsive-type person,” began preparing for his wife’s death. He made cremation arrangements. He visited a printer and prepared a death announcement for Priscilla. Then he focused on putting together her book, “Sermons and Meditations,” which offers an eloquent, widely sourced study of theology from the perspective of a feminist and an environmentalist.

“That was a very therapeutic thing for me,” Bill says of the book project.

And then the mysterious, maddening, wonderful creation that is the human body served up another surprise. At the end of 2013, Priscilla’s disease stopped progressing. It had run its course, a specialist told Bill. With good care, she could live for a long time. But the damage already done — the paralysis, the speech loss, the loss of memory and cognition — was likely irreversible.

These days, Bill awakens most mornings at 5 a.m. in the apartment he and Priscilla share at Bishop Spencer Place. He sets about slicing up fruits for Priscilla to eat at lunch and supper. About an hour later he escorts his wife to the skilled nursing portion of the complex and sees that she is settled at her usual breakfast table. He makes sure she drinks water.

Bill, 74, and a year older than his wife, then drives to the Stowers Institute, arriving around 6:30 a.m. A tall, rail-thin figure in blue jeans, he glides around its hallways at a clip that feels like a trot if you’re trying to keep up with him. He knows everyone by name, from top scientists to the servers in the cafe. He teaches a research course and writes papers, mostly for scientific publications. He also serves on the boards of several institutions.

Sometimes he visits the institute’s reptile facility, where he and a Stowers scientist, Peter Baumann, continue the study of unisexual lizard reproduction.

A couple of years ago, the scientific journal “Breviora” honored Neaves by lending his name to a new lizard species, aspidoscelis neavesi — Neaves’ whiptail lizard. And very recently, the “Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology,” out of Harvard University, named a different species aspidoscelis priscillae — Priscilla’s whiptail lizard. This is only appropriate. When they were much younger, Priscilla spent months collecting lizards with Bill in the deserts of New Mexico.

Bill Neaves returns to Bishop Spencer Place around 10:30 a.m. and stops in the cafe to buy Priscilla a cup of coffee. He helps her eat lunch and, again, makes sure she drinks water. Then it’s back to the Stowers Institute until about 3:30 p.m. Late afternoons and evenings are consumed by a routine of coffee, dinner, companionship and bedtime preparations.

It’s an “incredibly ritualized schedule,” Bill acknowledges. “But I read somewhere a few years ago that one of the practical bits of advice for people who are into Zen is to turn what might otherwise be routine activity into real rituals. That seems to work for Priscilla and me.”

If life had served up a different set of circumstances, Bill Neaves might be traveling the world right now, speaking at scientific conferences and soaking in the tributes due the founding president of a world-class research facility.

“I’m really glad I don’t have to do that anymore,” he tells me.

“Not that I wouldn’t rather be sitting on our deck looking over the trees at the Beartooth Wilderness in Montana with Priscilla, enjoying a glass of chardonnay, but this isn’t … isn’t bad,” Neaves says. “It’s better than I thought it would be. There’s still enough of Priscilla there to make it feel very rewarding to have the time with her.”

And what about Priscilla, the woman who broke barriers in her church, raised two children, comforted grieving families and lived with Bill in places as far-flung as Boston and Kenya?

For all of her life, she had been a reader, a writer and a thinker. As a hospital chaplain, she kept copious notes about her encounters with patients and their families.

“I was impressed by this woman’s strength,” Priscilla wrote, after an encounter with a single mother. “She did not act like a victim, although she has been victimized and suffered many hard times. She did the best she could, and that was pretty amazing.”

Now the ravages of a terrible disease have left Priscilla unable to write down her thoughts, or verbalize them. But remarks in the sermons that her husband compiled seem prescient.

“Cherish the time you have with those you love,” she counseled a group in the Carroll County Hospital Chapel. “Don’t wait for tomorrow. Don’t let the deadlines and demands of daily life delay the dreams you share.”

And this: “As we all move closer to a grave, the fleeting time we are given with each other is so precious when measured against the time of eternity. How are we using that time?”

—Barbara Shelly is a veteran journalist and writer based in Kansas City

“Life After the Diagnosis: Expert Advice on Living Well with Serious Illness” – podcast

Last summer, Steve Pantilat, MD, was interviewed by GeriPal, a blog (geripal.org) that focuses on geriatric medicine. Dr. Pantilat is a palliative care physician at UCSF. The interview occurred shortly after his book was published — “Life After the Diagnosis: Expert Advice on Living Well with Serious Illness for Patients and Caregivers.”

We posted a link to the podcast of the interview on Brain Support Network’s Facebook page at the time, but I just got around today to listening to the podcast. Here’s are some highlights for me:

* “There’s this idea that somehow if we talk about what’s really happening, like how serious your prognosis is, or the fact that you have in fact a life limiting illness, that somehow that’s gonna take away hope and so, let’s not talk about it, we need to leave people with hope. But I worry that what that leaves people with is false hope. And that fundamentally, false hope is no hope. And if we talk about hope, we can really promote it and we can encourage it and to recognize that people have hope, even when we take care of people who are days away from the end of life, who are actively dying. They still have hope for things that are meaningful to them. And by talking about it, we can really encourage people to have hope, and to build on and to recognize, yeah, there’s hope for cure, sure. But there’s hope for a lot of other things that can coexist within the hope for cure, or alongside that hope, and we can encourage that.”

* “[We] talk about a good death but I don’t see death as good. I’ve seen it only as being sad and filled with grief and loss, and nothing we do seems to make it good. And the tragedy … I recently took care of a forty-two-year-old woman with an eight-year-old child in the hospital. She died in the hospital. People would say, ‘Oh, that’s a bad death,’ but you know, what was bad is that she died. And if she had died at home, it wouldn’t change the tragedy and the sadness and the grief and loss associated with her death.”

* The interviewer mentioned a story in the book about Sergei, an 80-year-old whose wife has dementia. Sergei hopes that the wife will get better. The interviewer asked Dr. Pantilat if this is false hope. “That I would say is false hope, we know that dementia does not reverse. …I realize that there was nothing I could say that would fundamentally change his hope in his wife getting better and I realize my role at that point was just to support him in that hope. … But, you know, there’s a time to push and there’s a time to accept and support and that was a time to accept and support.”

* “Realistic prognosis focuses hope. They give patients reliable and realistic information they can use to make decisions.”

* “[We] often give people this false choice, we say, ‘Do you want quantity of life or quality of life?’ And it’s somehow, if you want quantity of life, you have to accept all the possible interventions to attack your illness or to treat your illness. Every chemotherapy regimen, every procedure, and so on. And what we know now is that, in fact, there comes a time when some of those things not only don’t help you live longer but may actually ruin your quality of life. Chemotherapy in the last six months of life, for example. And that somehow if you want quality of life, it means you’re not gonna live quite as long. And what we know from Palliative Care, from the research, from the literature in our field, is that you can get both. And Palliative Care helps you live better and at least as long, maybe longer, but certainly no shorter, and you can live well and long. And part of my book, the point is to really get people to engage with and ask for and demand Palliative Care to live well and to live long.”

* He talks about using a word like “progress.” “Like progressive illness, your illness has progressed. ‘Oh, that’s great!’ No, that’s terrible. So I now think about this when I talk with my patients and I say, ‘Your heart failure is worse,’ rather than saying, your heart failure has progressed…”

* “Dignity is one of those very loaded words that’s in fact very personal. … And so we often use this word as a code for certain things. Like, respect your dignity by withdrawing interventions and what we should … If we’re gonna use that word, we [physicians] really need to embed it in what the patient and family think of as dignity and their interpretation of dignity and try to support that idea, not our own.”

* “If despite CPR, you die, your final moments will have been spent at the center of a tornado and while a team works on your body, your family will be watching the horror or be banished from the room. In either case, they won’t be with you, at your side, holding your hand.”

* “I think there’s a way in which people with serious illness think, ‘Why not? Why not just try it?’ And the evidence really suggests that when your illness is very advanced, to the point that you die of it, CPR isn’t really gonna help you. It’s not gonna help you at all and you’re gonna end up sicker. I think there’s a way that people think it’s like reset the computer. … But we all know that even if you survive CPR, you’re gonna be worse off than you were and there are implications, maybe not for you, I think this idea that somehow it’s suffering for the patient, I think is not right. We do CPR generally on people who have died. And so I don’t see that there’s a lot of added suffering to the person who’s died but there is this impact on their loved ones who might be at the bedside. And we have to remember what their experience is as well.”

* “[We] have to be careful to remember that all we’re saying is, ‘When you die, when your heart stops and you stop breathing, we will not try to revive you because it won’t work. We’ll let you die peacefully.’ But that has no bearing on all the other care that we will continue to provide. And we have to emphasize what we’ll continue in the meantime and all the care we will provide to make sure people are comfortable and well cared for so that we don’t see this decision about CPR at the very end as somehow implicating something more than it is.”

You can read the full transcript and listen to the podcast here:

www.geripal.org/2017/07/life-after-diagnosis-podcast-with-steve-pantilat.html

Dr. Pantilat was also interviewed at the Commonwealth Club of California last summer. A recording of that interview can be found here:

www.commonwealthclub.org/events/archive/podcast/life-after-diagnosis-how-live-well-serious-illness

And he was interviewed on KQED’s Forum show last summer. That recording is here:

ww2.kqed.org/forum/2017/08/01/living-well-with-chronic-illness/

Happy listening!

Robin

 

A revolution in health care is coming (The Economist)

This interesting lead article in the Economist magazine (economist.com) is about how we will all become our own doctors, leading a health care revolution.

Here’s an excerpt:

Better flow of medical data “is likely to bear fruit in several ways. One is better diagnosis. … A second benefit lies in the management of complex diseases. … Patients can also improve the efficiency of their care. … A final benefit of putting patients in charge stems from the generation and aggregation of their data.”

And a full link to the article:

www.economist.com/news/leaders/21736138-welcome-doctor-you-revolution-health-care-coming

Anxiety, Depression, and Apathy (in Parkinson’s) – lecture notes

Brain Support Network has another volunteer who is attending lecture, reading articles, and sharing notes. His name is Adrian Quintero. He’s also a BSN part-time employee, helping families with brain donation arrangements. (He would be happy to help your family too!)

Last Saturday, he attended a Parkinson’s support group meeting in Berkeley. The speaker was Dr. Andreea Seritan, a geriatric psychiatrist from UCSF. Her talk was about anxiety, depression, and apathy in Parkinson’s. While some of the talk was specific to Parkinson’s, most of the treatment of these two symptoms applies to those in the Brain Support Network community (Lewy body dementia, multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration).

Here are Adrian’s notes….


Notes by Adrian Quintero, Brain Support Network volunteer

Speaker: Andreea Seritan, MD, geriatric psychiatrist, UCSF Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Center
Title of Talk: Addressing Anxiety and Depression in Parkinson’s Disease
Date: January 20, 2018, PD Active Forum

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a neuropsychiatric disease. Many doctors don’t realize this, and think it just affects motor skills, overlooking the psychiatric component.

Anxiety and Depression are among the most common symptoms with PD, and are important to treat as part of the disease. There is often a stigma associated with seeing a mental health provider that can make treatment of both more difficult.

Very common in people with PD. The literature on it says it’s about 40%. For Dr. Seritan’s practice it’s closer to two-thirds of the people she sees. Anxiety can present very differently person to person.

Anxiety can often precede the onset of motor symptoms.

There are physical symptoms associated with anxiety. Dr. Seritan finds people with PD are often very attuned to their bodies and are good at describing physical symptoms. Some more typical physical symptoms of anxiety include rapid heartbeat, shortness of breath, increase of tremor. More atypical symptoms, such as abdominal pain, head pressure, dizziness, may not been seen by doctors as being anxiety related.

“Wearing Off” of medication
Some people experience anxiety during the time period where there is a drop in medication between doses.
Generally happens in the late afternoon, daily, is more predictable than panic attacks that can happen out of the blue.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Categorized by “excessive worry” more than 6 months
Is more of a baseline of anxiety that “sits” throughout the day (vs. comes on for a period of time like wearing off)
Some of the diagnostic symptoms can be hard to distinguish from PD, such as: sleep disturbances, muscle tension, easily fatigued, hard to concentrate, restlessness

Panic Disorder
Experiencing panic attacks, which are peaks of anxiety, generally short episodes that reoccur. In between episodes there is worry about having another episode.

Social Anxiety
Performance anxiety is the part of social anxiety that Dr. Seritan sees many PD patients struggling with. Such things as giving presentations, public speaking, can be very difficult for PD patients, as there is often worry about having tremors in front of people. Especially if someone hasn’t shared their diagnosis at work, etc, there can be added stress of a fear of a visible hand tremor.

Depression
Like anxiety, depression is complicated, and experienced differently by each person affected.
In PD patients, it is less common than anxiety, literature showing about 35% of PD patients experiencing depression, and 17% diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder.
Like anxiety, depression may precede the onset of motor symptoms associated with PD.
When untreated, depression may increase PD symptoms – worsen motor symptoms, cause cognitive deficit. Alcohol and drugs may worsen mood. With depression there is the added risk factor for suicide.

Major Depressive Episode
(5 of the 9 symptoms needed for diagnosis)
-depressed mood, lack of interest (for more than 2 weeks)
-Anhedonia – which is lack of interest in normally pleasurable activities
-Increase or decrease in sleep (again difficult because many PD patients have sleep disturbances)
-Increase or decrease in appetite/ Weight loss or gain
-Feeling guilty or worthless
-Moving slowly (symptom for general population)
-Poor concentration/ memory (people often wonder if dementia is the cause)
-Low energy
-Suicidal thoughts or behavior

Many medical conditions can affect or cause depression, such as:
Thyroid imbalances, strokes, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, post heart surgery or heart attacks (especially in men), chronic pain

Some medications can affect or cause depression, such as:
Some common blood pressure meds, GERD meds, pain meds, sedatives (like Xanax), steroids (like interferon, prednisone), Anticonvulsants (which could be used for tremors)

Apathy
Different from, and less studied, than depression
-not enough energy, feeling “blah”
-20-36% of new onset PD patients
-40-45% overall patients with PD
-lack of drive

Having a schedule and events where others can help hold someone accountable can help (such as Rock Steady Boxing classes, etc.)

Treatment Approaches for Anxiety and Depression
Dr. Seritan likes to start off with the non-pharmaceutical treatments first, which can include:
-exercise (such as Rock Steady Boxing, Dance for PD)
-diet
-good sleep hygiene
-minimize alcohol and drugs (including marijuana). Alcohol can aggravate depression, as well as affect balance, and disturb the sleep/wake cycle.

Other non-pharmaceutical treatments may include:

Gratitude practice
-practicing 3 weeks of journaling where every night you count 5-10 things that you’re grateful for. There is a book called “Thanks” that talks about this practice.
-Such practices have shown to increase sleep and energy, lower depression, and have no side effects!

Self-Efficacy
-Believing in the ability to accomplish goals. People often lose this feeling when they are diagnosed with PD. They may also experience a loss of identity, family role, loss of income, etc.
-Re-adjust goals- Look to strategies that have worked in previous moments of crisis, those strategies will work again
-How we see ourselves is important. Sometimes we may need the help of a mental health professional to act as a mirror.

Psychotherapy
-CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)- the most well-studied therapy for anxiety and depression.
-MBI (Mindfulness Based Interventions)- paying attention to the present moment non-judgementally. There is increasing studies and evidence as to the effectiveness of such interventions. Can help memory, executive functioning and cognitive functioning.
-MBSR (Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction)- often used in medical settings, there are groups oriented around learning this
-MBCT (Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy)- Combination of CBT and MBSR, used at UCSF.

Treatment with Medications
In general, timing of when medications are taken is important.

-Wearing-off Issue- Dr. Seritan suggests working with doctor to adjust timing and dose of medication. If experiencing several times a day, treatment of base anxiety may be needed.
-For PD patients who had anxiety and depression before PD diagnosis, SSRIs and SNRIs can be helpful for treatment.

Benzos
-used for anxiety attacks/ peaks, can help with wearing off anxiety, also used at times for restless legs
-NOT good for Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and shouldn’t be used for insomnia
-Recommends NOT taking daily, as risk for dependence
-Look at risk/benefit analysis of using
-don’t mix with alcohol or sleep-aids
-Xanax has a short half-life and can cause rebound effects. Dr. Seritan prefers medications with a longer half-life
-Some benzos can cause memory problems, and increase risk of fall
-Some can be sedating and are best taken at nighttime

Sleep-Aids
-Sleep disturbance is a major symptom of anxiety, depression, and PD
-Trazadone- may cause grogginess
-Ambien- there is a dose differential for men and women
-Melatonin- natural aide, Dr. Seritan suggests taking 2 hours prior to bedtime. It can be combined with Ambien
-Gabapentin- good for anxiety, sleep, and pain. Have to modify dose so as not to cause sleeping during the day

Social/Performance Anxiety
-Beta blockers can be good used PRN. There are possible side effects of increased depression and fatigue

Apathy treatment
“Activating” antidepressants such as: Buproprion, Duloxetine, Venlafaxine
-Stimulants- Does NOT recommend Ritalin, etc. Instead Dr. Seratin treats with Modafinil or Armodafinil

Deep Brain Stimulation
-DBS is approved for PD to improve motor symptoms. There are surgery risks involved, as well as psychiatric risks. It can increase anxiety and depression, as well as impulsivity. It may decrease anxiety and depression for some people. At SFSU, they have a long evaluative process with the team.

Overall, PD is a stressor on the brain, and medications add additional stress. When treating PD patients, the dose may need to be less, as is true for older adults as well.

Pain Management treatment
-Lots of patients take cannabis for pain. May be evidence for help with insomnia. Dr. Seritan does not recommend cannabis for treatment of mood or anxiety.
-Sometimes tricyclic anti-depressants may be prescribed for pain management.
-Often patients are already on several medications. Can be helpful to see a pain specialist.

Advance Care Directive for Dementia (New York Times)

This recent New York Times (nytimes.com) article is about the idea that the typical advance care directive doesn’t say much about dementia.  A physician recently developed a dementia-specific advance directive, which you can find here:

* Advance Directive for Dementia, dementia-directive.org

Two other resources are referred to in the article —

* The Conversation Project, theconversationproject.org
* Prepare for Your Care, prepareforyourcare.org

(I have previously posted about those resources.)

Here’s a link to the full article:

www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/health/dementia-advance-directive.html

One Day Your Mind May Fade. At Least You’ll Have a Plan.
by Paula Span
The New Old Age/The New York Times
Jan. 19, 2018
Robin