AD Presenting as CBS (2006)

CBS folks –

Probably half of the people I’ve helped with brain donation who had a clinical diagnosis of CBS (or CBD) ended up with a confirmed diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) upon brain autopsy. The case of someone recently was the same. One clue in that case was that the person experienced myoclonus which, surprisingly, is more associated with AD than CBD. The Mayo Clinic neuropathology report in this recent case gave the citation to a 2006 article as a reference item. This post is about that 2006 article.

That 2006 article is a case report of a 60-year-old man presenting with “slowly progressive left hemi-Parkinsonism, left hand apraxia, myoclonus, dystonia, visuospatial disturbances, and alien limb phenomenon, resembling corticobasal syndrome.” The man died 8 years after symptom onset. Neuropathological analysis showed that the man had Alzheimer’s Disease. The authors say that the “CBS-like presentation in AD is rare.” Four years later, I don’t think researchers would make the same statement. Indeed, in late 2009, researchers from Mayo, led by Dr. Hu, published research in which 11 of 16 clinical CBS cases ended up having Alzheimer’s Disease upon brain autopsy. One thing I learned from that late 2009 article was that alien limb is not a significant syndrome when differentiating between CBD and AD.

I’ve copied the abstract below.

Robin

Movement Disorders. 2006 Nov;21(11):2018-22.

Alzheimer’s disease presenting as corticobasal syndrome.

Chand P, Grafman J, Dickson D, Ishizawa K, Litvan I.
Department of Neurology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA.

Abstract
A 60-year-old man presented with slowly progressive left hemi-Parkinsonism, left hand apraxia, myoclonus, dystonia, visuospatial disturbances, and alien limb phenomenon, resembling corticobasal syndrome. Eight years later, neuropathology revealed features of Alzheimer’s disease, with asymmetrical (right more than left) cortical tau burden with image analysis. The videotaped clinical features, neuropsychological aspects, and neuropathological correlates are presented and discussed.

PubMed ID#: 16977625 (see pubmed.gov for the abstract only)

Davunetide Research Update (2/8/11 webinar)

I listened to Dr. Morimoto’s presentation yesterday during the CurePSP webinar. My notes are copied below. I thought the background he gave on animal studies (transgenic mice) was fascinating. Otherwise, there wasn’t anything new for me. I was surprised he didn’t mention the pilot study at all. If any of you listened in and found something interesting, please share!

You can find a video/audio recording of the presentation on the CurePSP website here:
http://curepsp.na5.acrobat.com/p92435146/

You can find a PDF of the slides on the CurePSP website here:
http://www.psp.org/file_download/a84748 … 52e9e8ccf8

Of course the slides won’t contain the Q&A.

Robin

Davunetide Research Update
Presenter: Bruce Morimoto, PhD, Vice President, Drug Development, Allon Therapeutics, Inc.
2/8/11 Webinar

[I didn’t take notes on the background he gave on Allon Therapeutics.]

Drug development is a highly regulated and lengthy process:
Preclinical: lab and animal research
Phase I: early clinical safety testing
Phase II: patient safety; early efficacy
Phase III: efficacy; safety
Ends in new drug application, FDA review, and FDA approval

Description of PSP:
* A degenerative disease involving the brain stem, basal ganglia, and cerebellum. These regions control movement.
* Clinical symptoms (movement problems, cognitive impairment) are the apparent result of the underlying tau pathology in the brain region controlling those functions.

Image from Williams and Lees; Lancet Neurology 2009;8:270-279. Location of pathology in Richardson’s Syndrome. Pathology in upper regions gives rise to cognitive impairment. Pathology in lower regions gives rise to movement problems.

In response to both disease and injury, the brain produces a protein called ADNP (activity dependent neuroprotective protein). Image on right side shows nucleotide sequence.

Davunetide has other names, including:
NAP
NAPVSIPQ Peptide
AL-108
AL-208

Davunetide protects and repairs the cell’s scaffolding (cytoskeleton/microtubules). The image on the right shows that davunetide protected a cell from zinc chloride toxin.

Microtubules form the scaffold within the cell. Microtubules are essential for the neuronal structure and function. As the cell becomes sick through neurodegenerative, the microtubules fall apart. As that happens, you lose the structure of the neuron and the function. It begins to die. Then the tau protein becomes chemically modified and starts clumping up. This gives rise to the pathology of PSP. Images from Stamelou, et al; Brain 2010:133;1578-1590.

Animal model for tau pathology:
* Created mice which progressively develop tau pathologies and spatial memory deficit. (Both a cognitive impairment as well as tau pathology.)
* Transgenic (Tg) mice given two human tau mutations. These mutations are associated with a severe FTD phenotype. (PSP is a type of FTD.)

In a study, animals were administered davunetide intra-nasally. The chemical modification associated with tau protein was analyzed. The study’s conclusion: restoration of normal tau phosphorylation levels. The level of tau went down with davunetide. This was the first hint that davunetide might affect this pathology.

Also analyzed the tangle pathology in the mice brains. The study’s conclusion: davunetide treatment reduces the number of NFTs (neurofibrillary tangles). This means that the total amount of pathology is reduced. It’s a modest improvement but is statistically significant. Shiryaev et al (2009) Neurobiology of Disease 34, 381.

While it’s important that the treatment reduces the pathology, it’s more important that the treatment improves symptoms. The tau double mutant mice, once given davunetide, showed improved learning and memory in the Morris water maze. The tau double mutant mice performed nearly as well as normal mice.

Through these studies, we see that davunetide is having an effect on:
1- the pathway that is leading to the development of the pathology
2- the level of pathology
3- behavior

Human testing of davunetide:
1) Phase 1 clinical safety studies done in (a) healthy young, middle-aged and elderly adults, and (b) Alzheimer’s Disease
2) Phase 2 clinical safety and efficacy studies done in: (a) amnestic MCI (pre-cursor to AD). After 3-month treatment, there was memory improvement. And (b) chronic cognitively-impaired schizophrenia patients. After 3-month treatment, improvement in functional capacity (everyday activities) and possible improvement in memory.

Side effects observed in previous davunetide studies:
* nasal passage complaints such as runny nose, nasal or sinus congestion, throat or sinus pain. These were potentially related to the intranasal administration.
* headache
* dizziness. Note that many PSP patients already have gait instability, episodic dizziness, and/or history of falls.
* nausea
* excessive sweating

Rationale for study of AL-108-231 in PSP:
1) In preclinical (animal) studies, davunetide reduces the tau pathology that is seen in PSP. And reducing the pathology in animals results in an improvement in behavioral outcomes.
2) In clinical studies, davunetide is: well-tolerated with modest side effects; gets into brain; improved memory in aMCI patients (pre-Alzheimer’s Disease); and improved ability to conduct daily tasks in cognitively-impaired schizophrenia patients.

Study design for AL-108-231:
* multicenter, multinational: approximately 300 PSP patients will be treated for 1 year at about 47 clinical sites in US, Canada, Australia, Germany, UK and France.
* Placebo-controlled: 1:1 ratio
* couble-blind

Key patient qualifications:
* probable or possible diagnosis of PSP with no other neurologic disease
* 41 to 85 years old
* reliable caregiver
* patient and caregiver must be fluent in local language so that interviews can be completed
* reside outside skilled nursing home or care facility at the start of the study
* ability to take 5 steps with walker or minor assistance
* parkinson medications must be stable for 90 days and other medications must be stable for 30 days

Study assessments
* Patient and caregiver interviews: safety (adverse events, con meds) and efficacy (disease severity, daily living, cognitive, mood)
* Lab tests including nasal examination, blood tests, MRI scan, lumbar puncture (optional), eye movement (optional at some sites), DNA collection (optional)

31 sites in North America: coordinating center in North America is UCSF. Dr. Adam Boxer is the study physician.

15 sites in Europe: half the sites in Germany are up and running; half the sites in the UK are up and running; the French sites should be up and running in another month or so.

1 site in Australia: Dr. David Williams in Melbourne. Open for recruitment.

For more information:
* see clinicaltrials.gov, study NCT01110720
* contact Allon Therapeutics: Sue Anne Crocker, [email protected]

Q&A: [I re-ordered these]

Question: Do you expect that davunetide will un-do damage that has already been done?

Answer: Our expectation is to prevent additional damage from occurring. We don’t expect to un-do damage that has already been done.

Question: In the 12-week pilot, there was no evidence to suggest efficacy. Does this concern you?

Answer: No. We were not expecting to see any kind of efficacy in the 12-week pilot study. It was a small study: a total of 12 patients. Not only PSP patients but also CBS patients.

Question: Will the drug help eye movements?

Answer: We don’t know. We are including this in the study since one of the distinguishing characteristics of PSP is eye movement problems. How does the eye movement dysfunction relate to some of the other impairments in PSP?

Question: What do we expect in terms of improvements?

Answer: We don’t know. Our best guess is that it’s going to take about 12 months before we see any affect from the treatment. The gains will be modest. We need a large sample size and a lengthy study period to be sure we are seeing improvements.

Question: I infer that only the Richardson’s Syndrome type of PSP patients are included. What can you say to a family dealing with another type of PSP as to the justification for this?

Answer: Inclusion criteria is really looking at the Richardson’s Syndrome type of PSP. In a clinical trial, we need to look at a similar population of patients.

Question: Is the study relevant to FTDs?

Answer: Tau pathology isn’t unique to PSP. CBS and PNFA have tau pathology. Alzheimer’s also has tau pathology.

We need to show that davunetide is effective in PSP before we can look into other conditions.

Question: Are MSA patients included in this study?

Answer: No, PSP only.

Dr. Morimoto’s Comment: Lots of questions about specific situations. Go to clinicaltrials.gov and find the site nearest you. Ask that site about your specific situation.

Dr. Morimoto’s Comment: A number of visits need to be made to the particular site. It’s up to the site to determine if you live close enough or not. Anecdotally, a number of people are travelling a long distance to participate.

[I had a few questions that didn’t get asked. They are: ]

Question: Is it reasonable to think that 47 sites can enroll 6-7 patients each to get to 300 patients? When do you anticipate the 300th patient will enroll?

Question: When might we see published data from this study?

Question: Since the Alzheimer’s market is bigger than the PSP market, why aren’t you testing this first in the AD market?

“Davunetide Research Update” (webinar, 2-8-2011)

CurePSP (psp.org) hosted a webinar yesterday to allow researchers to give an update on the experimental drug davunetide.  The key presenter was Bruce Morimoto, PhD, Vice President, Drug Development, Allon Therapeutics, Inc., the maker of davunetide.

My notes from Dr. Morimoto’s presentation and the question-and-answer session are below.

I thought the background Dr. Morimoto gave on animal studies (transgenic mice) was fascinating.  Otherwise, there wasn’t anything new for me.  I was surprised he didn’t mention the davunetide pilot study at all.  If any of you listened in and found something interesting, please share!

Editor’s Note:  Unfortunately these links are no longer working.
You can find a video/audio recording of the presentation on the CurePSP website here:
curepsp.na5.acrobat.com/p92435146/

You can find a PDF of the slides on the CurePSP website here:
www.psp.org/file_download/a8474849-0fa9-4ed9-8659-9452e9e8ccf8

Of course the slides won’t contain the Q&A.

Robin

——————————

Davunetide Research Update
Presenter:  Bruce Morimoto, PhD, Vice President, Drug Development, Allon Therapeutics, Inc.
CurePSP Webinar
February 8, 2011

[I didn’t take notes on the background he gave on Allon Therapeutics.]

Drug development is a highly regulated and lengthy process:
Preclinical:  lab and animal research
Phase I:  early clinical safety testing
Phase II:  patient safety; early efficacy
Phase III:  efficacy; safety
Ends in new drug application, FDA review, and FDA approval

Description of PSP:
* A degenerative disease involving the brain stem, basal ganglia, and cerebellum.  These regions control movement.
* Clinical symptoms (movement problems, cognitive impairment) are the apparent result of the underlying tau pathology in the brain region controlling those functions.

Image from Williams and Lees; Lancet Neurology 2009;8:270-279.  Location of pathology in Richardson’s Syndrome.  Pathology in upper regions gives rise to cognitive impairment.  Pathology in lower regions gives rise to movement problems.

In response to both disease and injury, the brain produces a protein called ADNP (activity dependent neuroprotective protein).  Image on right side shows nucleotide sequence.

Davunetide has other names, including:
NAP
NAPVSIPQ Peptide
AL-108
AL-208

Davunetide protects and repairs the cell’s scaffolding (cytoskeleton/microtubules).  The image on the right shows that davunetide protected a cell from zinc chloride toxin.

Microtubules form the scaffold within the cell.  Microtubules are essential for the neuronal structure and function.  As the cell becomes sick through neurodegenerative, the microtubules fall apart.  As that happens, you lose the structure of the neuron and the function.  It begins to die.  Then the tau protein becomes chemically modified and starts clumping up.  This gives rise to the pathology of PSP.  Images from Stamelou, et al; Brain 2010:133;1578-1590.

Animal model for tau pathology:
* Created mice which progressively develop tau pathologies and spatial memory deficit.  (Both a cognitive impairment as well as tau pathology.)
* Transgenic (Tg) mice given two human tau mutations.  These mutations are associated with a severe FTD phenotype.  (PSP is a type of FTD.)

In a study, animals were administered davunetide intra-nasally.  The chemical modification associated with tau protein was analyzed.  The study’s conclusion:  restoration of normal tau phosphorylation levels.  The level of tau went down with davunetide.  This was the first hint that davunetide might affect this pathology.

Also analyzed the tangle pathology in the mice brains.  The study’s conclusion:  davunetide treatment reduces the number of NFTs (neurofibrillary tangles).  This means that the total amount of pathology is reduced.  It’s a modest improvement but is statistically significant.  Shiryaev et al (2009) Neurobiology of Disease 34, 381.

While it’s important that the treatment reduces the pathology, it’s more important that the treatment improves symptoms.  The tau double mutant mice, once given davunetide, showed improved learning and memory in the Morris water maze.  The tau double mutant mice performed nearly as well as normal mice.

Through these studies, we see that davunetide is having an effect on:
1- the pathway that is leading to the development of the pathology
2- the level of pathology
3- behavior

Human testing of davunetide:
1) Phase 1 clinical safety studies done in (a) healthy young, middle-aged and elderly adults, and (b) Alzheimer’s Disease
2) Phase 2 clinical safety and efficacy studies done in:  (a) amnestic MCI (pre-cursor to AD).  After 3-month treatment, there was memory improvement.  And (b) chronic cognitively-impaired schizophrenia patients.  After 3-month treatment, improvement in functional capacity (everyday activities) and possible improvement in memory.

Side effects observed in previous davunetide studies:
* nasal passage complaints such as runny nose, nasal or sinus congestion, throat or sinus pain.  These were potentially related to the intranasal administration.
* headache
* dizziness.  Note that many PSP patients already have gait instability, episodic dizziness, and/or history of falls.
* nausea
* excessive sweating

Rationale for study of AL-108-231 in PSP:
1) In preclinical (animal) studies, davunetide reduces the tau pathology that is seen in PSP.  And reducing the pathology in animals results in an improvement in behavioral outcomes.
2) In clinical studies, davunetide is:  well-tolerated with modest side effects; gets into brain; improved memory in aMCI patients (pre-Alzheimer’s Disease); and improved ability to conduct daily tasks in cognitively-impaired schizophrenia patients.

Study design for AL-108-231:
* multicenter, multinational:  approximately 300 PSP patients will be treated for 1 year at about 47 clinical sites in US, Canada, Australia, Germany, UK and France.
* Placebo-controlled: 1:1 ratio
* couble-blind

Key patient qualifications:
* probable or possible diagnosis of PSP with no other neurologic disease
* 41 to 85 years old
* reliable caregiver
* patient and caregiver must be fluent in local language so that interviews can be completed
* reside outside skilled nursing home or care facility at the start of the study
* ability to take 5 steps with walker or minor assistance
* parkinson medications must be stable for 90 days and other medications must be stable for 30 days

Study assessments
* Patient and caregiver interviews:  safety (adverse events, con meds) and efficacy (disease severity, daily living, cognitive, mood)
* Lab tests including nasal examination, blood tests, MRI scan, lumbar puncture (optional), eye movement (optional at some sites), DNA collection (optional)

31 sites in North America:  coordinating center in North America is UCSF.  Dr. Adam Boxer is the study physician.

15 sites in Europe:  half the sites in Germany are up and running; half the sites in the UK are up and running; the French sites should be up and running in another month or so.

1 site in Australia:  Dr. David Williams in Melbourne.  Open for recruitment.

For more information:
* see clinicaltrials.gov, study NCT01110720
* contact Allon Therapeutics:  Sue Anne Crocker, [email protected]

Q&A:  [I re-ordered these]

Question:  Do you expect that davunetide will un-do damage that has already been done?

Answer:  Our expectation is to prevent additional damage from occurring.  We don’t expect to un-do damage that has already been done.

Question:  In the 12-week pilot, there was no evidence to suggest efficacy.  Does this concern you?

Answer:  No.  We were not expecting to see any kind of efficacy in the 12-week pilot study.  It was a small study:  a total of 12 patients.  Not only PSP patients but also CBS patients.

Question:  Will the drug help eye movements?

Answer:  We don’t know.  We are including this in the study since one of the distinguishing characteristics of PSP is eye movement problems.  How does the eye movement dysfunction relate to some of the other impairments in PSP?

Question:  What do we expect in terms of improvements?

Answer:  We don’t know.  Our best guess is that it’s going to take about 12 months before we see any affect from the treatment.  The gains will be modest.  We need a large sample size and a lengthy study period to be sure we are seeing improvements.

Question:  I infer that only the Richardson’s Syndrome type of PSP patients are included.  What can you say to a family dealing with another type of PSP as to the justification for this?

Answer:  Inclusion criteria is really looking at the Richardson’s Syndrome type of PSP.  In a clinical trial, we need to look at a similar population of patients.

Question:  Is the study relevant to FTDs?

Answer:  Tau pathology isn’t unique to PSP.  CBS and PNFA have tau pathology.  Alzheimer’s also has tau pathology.

We need to show that davunetide is effective in PSP before we can look into other conditions.

Question:  Are MSA patients included in this study?

Answer:  No, PSP only.

Dr. Morimoto’s Comment:  Lots of questions about specific situations.  Go to clinicaltrials.gov and find the site nearest you.  Ask that site about your specific situation.

Dr. Morimoto’s Comment:  A number of visits need to be made to the particular site.  It’s up to the site to determine if you live close enough or not.  Anecdotally, a number of people are travelling a long distance to participate.

[I had a few questions that didn’t get asked.  They are: ]

Question:  Is it reasonable to think that 47 sites can enroll 6-7 patients each to get to 300 patients?  When do you anticipate the 300th patient will enroll?

Question:  What’s the baseline PSP Rating Scale score for those who participated in the pilot?  What’s the baseline MMSE score for those who participated in the pilot?

Question:  I’ve heard that we might see published data from this study in 2013.  Do you think that’s reasonable?  Are we talking the beginning of 2013 or the end of 2013?

Question:  Since the Alzheimer’s market is bigger than the PSP market, why aren’t you testing this first in the AD market?

Clinical diagnosis of CBD; autopsy showed CJD

In case you needed more evidence that CBD mimics other disorders… This is a case of a 73-year-old Japanese woman who “showed slowly progressive aphasia, apraxia and dementia. She had no family history of prion disease or dementia. One year later she showed parkinsonism and corticobasal degeneration was initially suspected. … The patient developed myoclonus and an akinetic mutism state 15 months and 22 months after onset, respectively.”

She died at age 81. A brain autopsy was performed. It revealed she had a genetic form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Robin

Neuropathology. 2011 Jan 27. [Epub ahead of print]

An autopsied case of V180I Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease presenting with panencephalopathic-type pathology and a characteristic prion protein type.

Iwasaki Y, Mori K, Ito M, Nagaoka M, Ieda T, Kitamoto T, Yoshida M, Hashizume Y.
Departments of Neurology Pathology, Oyamada Memorial Spa Hospital Department of Neurology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi Division of CJD Science and Technology, Department of Neurological Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai Department of Neuropathology, Institute for Medical Science of Aging, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.

Abstract
A 73-year-old Japanese woman showed slowly progressive aphasia, apraxia and dementia. She had no family history of prion disease or dementia.

One year later she showed parkinsonism and corticobasal degeneration was initially suspected. On MRI, the left temporal neocortex seemed swollen on T2-weighted images in the initial stage, and a later high-signal intensity region was observed in the cerebral cortex in diffusion-weighted images.

The patient developed myoclonus and an akinetic mutism state 15 months and 22 months after onset, respectively. Consecutive electroencephalography revealed no periodic sharp-wave complexes.

Prion protein (PrP) gene analysis revealed a valine to isoleucine point mutation at codon 180, and methionine homozygosity at codon 129.

This patient’s clinical symptoms and disease course were atypical for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), and a stable state with nasal tube-feeding lasted several years.

She died of respiratory failure at the age of 81, 102 months after the onset.

Autopsy revealed widespread spongiform degeneration with weak synaptic-type PrP deposition, confirming the diagnosis of genetic CJD. Neurons in the cerebral cortex were relatively preserved in number and hypertrophic astrocytosis was generally moderate for such long-term disease, but cerebral white matter showed diffuse severe myelin pallor with tissue rarefaction suggestive of panencephalopatic-type pathology. The cerebellar cortex was relatively well preserved with observation of mild spongiform change in the molecular layer, moderate neuron loss in the Purkinje neuron layer, and scattered small plaque-like PrP deposition. Western blot analysis of protease-resistant PrP showed a characteristic pattern without a diglycoform band.

V180I CJD is an interesting form of genetic CJD with regards to the clinicopathologic, molecular and genetic findings.

© 2011 Japanese Society of Neuropathology.

PubMed ID#: 21269331 (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)

Clinical-pathological correlates in PSP (and MSA)

This is a terrific little study done comparing brain tissue of 15 PSP cases, 12 MSA cases, 8 PD cases, and 8 healthy controls, and correlating the pathology with clinical variables (age at onset, disease duration, and symptoms).

The study was done in Australia using tissue donated to the Sydney Brain Bank. I say it was a “little” study because the previous clinical-pathological correlation study in MSA and PSP had much larger numbers — 110 PSP cases and 83 MSA cases. That larger Queen Square Brain Bank (UK) study “did not consider the pathological severity of disease or assess pathological correlations to clinical features.” (This is O’Sullivan’s “Clinical outcomes” article published in the journal Brain in 2008.  We have posted about that here.)

The symptoms studied include the:

“presence or absence of…bradykinesia and rigidity, resting tremor, postural instability, response to levodopa (L-dopa) therapy, dementia as indicated from the last Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score, early falls (within the first 2 years of onset), supranuclear vertical gaze abnormalities (abnormal or slow vertical gaze and/or supranuclear gaze palsy), dysarthria, dysphagia, postural hypotension, autonomic and urinary dysfunction, and gait ataxia. The severity of parkinsonism was assessed using the last Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) score prior to death.”

Here’s some key data on the clinical variables:

Age at onset
PSP: 67 years +/- 9 years

Disease duration
PSP: 7 years +/- 4 years

Phenotype (parkinsonian: parkinsonian-plus)
PSP: 5:10

% L-dopa responsive
PSP: 47%

% demented
PSP: 67%
MSA: 0%

% early falls
PSP: 93%

% gaze abnormalities
PSP: 73%

% dysarthria
PSP: 60%

% autonomic dysfunction
PSP: 47%

% gait ataxia
PSP: 40%

The researchers divide cases by phenotype — parkinsonian or parkinsonian-plus. My assumption is that, for PSP, the parkinsonian phenotype is called PSP-Parkinsonism and the parkinsonian-plus phenotype is called RS (Richardson’s Syndrome).

“As expected, response to L-dopa was associated with a parkinsonian phenotype across all groups, although resting tremor was not associated with either phenotype. The presence of supranuclear vertical gaze abnormalities and early falls was associated with a parkinsonian-plus phenotype across groups, although autonomic dysfunction and gait ataxia were not associated with either phenotype.”

I’ve copied the abstract below.

Robin

———

Movement Disorders. 2011 Jan 21.

Clinical correlates of similar pathologies in parkinsonian syndromes.

Song YJ, Huang Y, Halliday GM.
Neuroscience Research Australia and the University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract
BACKGROUND: There have been no previous studies assessing the severity of regional atrophy, cell loss and lesion densities between the overlapping conditions of Parkinson’s disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) and relating these pathologies to different clinical features.

METHODS: Clinical indices and basal ganglia, brainstem, and cerebellar pathology from 43 longitudinally studied cases (PD = 8, PSP = 15, MSA = 12, controls = 8) were compared. A point-counting method was used to evaluate subregional volumes, and alpha-synuclein and phospho-tau immunohistochemistry was used to assess pathological inclusions and stage disease severity. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify pathological associations with clinical features.

RESULTS: All PD, PSP, and MSA cases had severe degeneration of the substantia nigra. Clinical features correlated with tissue loss and the severity of inclusion pathologies. Levodopa responsiveness and a lack of resting tremor was associated with preservation of pallidal volume, the presence of gait ataxia was associated with atrophy of the putamen, and the parkinsonian-plus phenotype with early falls and supranuclear vertical gaze abnormalities had more substantial midbrain atrophy and greater inclusion pathology in the caudate nucleus.

DISCUSSION: This is the first study to compare the severity of regional pathologies across parkinsonian conditions. The data show that tissue loss and inclusion densities in certain regions correlate with clinical indices, with regional volume changes likely to be the best indicator of clinical progression of disease.

Copyright © 2011 Movement Disorder Society.

PubMed ID#: 21259341 (see pubmed.gov for the abstract only)