Social Worker’s Reading List for Dementia Caregiving

Marguerite Manteau-Rao, LCSW, is a local social worker with expertise in working with dementia caregivers.  As part of her private practice work with dementia caregivers, she recommends these books:

• Dr. Allen Power, Dementia Beyond Drugs
• Richard Taylor, Alzheimer’s From the Inside Out
• Olivia Ames Hoblitzelle, Ten Thousand Joys and Ten Thousand Sorrows
• Nancy Pearce, Inside Alzheimer’s
• Christine Bryden, Dancing With Dementia
• Jon Kabat-Zinn, Full Catastrophe Living
• Rick Hanson, Buddha’s Brain

I’ve read a few of these books as well.  Richard Taylor’s book is wonderful.  He was diagnosed with early onset Alzheimer’s.

Recently, Marguerite mentioned the book “Ten Thousand Joys and Ten Thousand Sorrows” in the context of being able to find joy in disruption.  It sounds like that book in particular would be of interest to all caregivers, not just caregivers to those with dementia.

Robin

5-Minute Film about MSA

This is a very touching 5-minute film about a woman (Patricia Drapkin) with multiple system atrophy (MSA).  The film maker is the woman’s daughter.  The focus is on the symptoms of MSA.  Some of the daughter’s feelings about her mother are shared.  The film has been entered into the 2012 Neuro Film Festival:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-Db2cMgvSs&feature=autoshare

You can reach the film maker, Paola Vermeer, at [email protected].  She is a cancer researcher at the University of South Dakota.

Robin

 

Suggestions for sharing the neuropathology report

Many families we help with brain donation arrangements share their loved one’s neuropathology report with us.  Thank you for doing this as it helps us learn too!  Plus we keep track of the clinical diagnosis and neuropathological diagnosis.  Often they are different.

We’d like to offer some suggestions of whom else you can share the report with besides Brain Support Network.

Most importantly, share the report with the diagnosing physician, who is probably a neurologist or psychiatrist.  Ask if that MD can talk with you and all family members by phone, drawing correlations between your family member’s clinical records and this neuropathology report.  Request that you be allowed to record the conversation.  Plan in advance for that conference call; prepare your list of questions.  Assign a family member or close friend to take notes.  Assist Brain Support Network by suggesting that physician send other families our way to make brain donation arrangements.

Share the report with any other physicians involved in your family member’s care — even primary care physicians.  This is how physicians can learn.  “Oh, that’s what someone with Lewy body dementia [or whatever the disorder is] behaves and appears!”  Again, suggest to those physicians that they send other families to Brain Support Network to make brain donation arrangements.

By the way, we think it’s important to share the report even with physicians who incorrectly diagnosed your family member.  Perhaps that’s most important as it’s a way the physician can learn.

I also requested that my father’s neuropathology report be placed in my personal medical record (with my primary care physician) as it is evidence of my family medical history.  Not everyone wants to do that.

Best wishes to your family and thank you again for the brain donation (as that helps us all),
Robin

 

Severe Autonomic Failure “Highly Predictive” of Autopsy-Confirmed MSA

This is an important article as it evaluates the clinical records of 29 patients with autopsy-confirmed multiple system atrophy (MSA) at Mayo Rochester.  All 29 of these patients had received “full autonomic function tests.”

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that several factors are “highly predictive” of autopsy-confirmed MSA:

1- “presence of severe generalised autonomic failure”

2- severe adrenergic failure.  I believe this is found by testing the blood pressure and heart rate response to the Valsalva manoeuvre and headup tilt.

3- severe sudomotor failure and widespread anhidrosis in particular.  Sudomotor failure is determined by the QSART (Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test) and the TST (Thermoregulatory Sweat Test).

4- “rapid progression of autonomic failure”

FOUR PHENOTYPES

Among these 29 patients, there were four phenotypes or clinical presentations for MSA:
* MSA-P:  18 of 29
* MSA-C:  8 of 29
* PAF (Pure Autonomic Failure):  2 of 29
* Parkinson’s Disease-like:  1 of 29

Disease duration was shortest for those with the MSA-P phenotype (5 years ± 1.8 years), and longest for those with the PAF phenotype (13 years ± 4.2 years).  In between were those with the MSA-C phenotype (8 years ± 3.6 years).

We are told that one of the MSA-P cases was an “atypical” case in which a diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration (CBD) — one of the other atypical parkinsonism disorders — was considered.  Due to the “severe generalised autonomic failure,” a diagnosis of MSA-P was made.

In another “atypical” case, PSP was considered due to the patient’s “flexed posture, axial as well as appendicular rigidity, limitation of vertical gaze and hypokinetic dysarthria.”  But “given the clinical features of nocturnal stridor and severe generalised autonomic failure, the most likely diagnosis was considered to be MSA.”  (This patient was put in the MSA-P group.)

Along with lots of other excerpts, I’ve copied the stories of all of the atypical cases.  The few of you who fall into that MSA-vs-PSP-vs-CBD category will want to read those stories.  You can really appreciate the challenge for the neurologist in making the clinical diagnosis.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

Some patients had brain MRIs completed.  “Cerebellar atrophy was the most common finding (10/16 patients) and the hot cross bun sign was present in two patients.”

The authors provided these two “clinical red flags” — rapid progression and early postural instability:

* “Rapid progression was characteristic, with gait impairment being present at motor onset in 75% of cases; 93% of patients progressed from motor onset to wheelchair dependency within 5 years.”

* “Another characteristic was early postural instability with mean time to first fall of 21±17 months. Retropulsion on the Pull Test was positive in 92% of patients when it was done at 21±18 months from onset of symptoms.”

Here’s what the authors said about parkinsonian symptoms:

* “A rest tremor was uncommon, being present in 10% of patients.”

* “Levodopa responsiveness was poor or poorly sustained in 80%.”

* “Symmetric motor involvement was the rule; symmetric bradykinesia in 78% and rigidity in 80%.”

I hope this is the first of many papers we see out of Mayo on clinical-pathological correlations in MSA.

The abstract is copied below.

Robin

———————–

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 6. [Epub ahead of print]

Autopsy confirmed multiple system atrophy cases: Mayo experience and role of autonomic function tests.

Iodice V, Lipp A, Ahlskog JE, Sandroni P, Fealey RD, Parisi JE, Matsumoto JY, Benarroch EE, Kimpinski K, Singer W, Gehrking TL, Gehrking JA, Sletten DM, Schmeichel AM, Bower JH, Gilman S, Figueroa J, Low PA.
Neurovascular and Autonomic Medicine Unit, Imperial College London, UK.

Abstract
Background
Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a sporadic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by autonomic failure, manifested as orthostatic hypotension or urogenital dysfunction, with combinations of parkinsonism that is poorly responsive to levodopa, cerebellar ataxia and corticospinal dysfunction.

Published autopsy confirmed cases have provided reasonable neurological characterisation but have lacked adequate autonomic function testing.

Objectives
To retrospectively evaluate if the autonomic characterisation of MSA is accurate in autopsy confirmed MSA and if consensus criteria are validated by autopsy confirmation.

Methods
29 autopsy confirmed cases of MSA evaluated at the Mayo Clinic who had undergone formalised autonomic testing, including adrenergic, sudomotor and cardiovagal functions and Thermoregulatory Sweat Test (TST), from which the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) was derived, were included in the study.

Results
Patient characteristics: 17 men, 12 women; age of onset 57±8.1 years; disease duration to death 6.5±3.3 years; first symptom autonomic in 18, parkinsonism in seven and cerebellar in two.

Clinical phenotype at first visit was MSA-P (predominant parkinsonism) in 18, MSA-C (predominant cerebellar involvement) in eight, pure autonomic failure in two and Parkinson’s disease in one.

Clinical diagnosis at last visit was MSA for 28 cases.

Autonomic failure was severe: CASS was 7.2±2.3 (maximum 10).

TST% was 65.6±33.9% and exceeded 30% in 82% of patients. The most common pattern was global anhidrosis.

Norepinephrine was normal supine (203.6±112.7) but orthostatic increment of 33.5±23.2% was reduced.

Four clinical features (rapid progression, early postural instability, poor levodopa responsiveness and symmetric involvement) were common.

Conclusion
The pattern of severe and progressive generalised autonomic failure with severe adrenergic and sudomotor failure combined with the clinical phenotype is highly predictive of MSA.

PubMed ID#:  22228725  (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)

DLB Patients Don’t Turn Their Heads to the Caregiver?

In this Japanese study, researchers gave a short cognitive test to patients with several types of dementia — 125 with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), 4 with AD plus vascular dementia, 8 with amnestic MCI (mild cognitive impairment), 34 with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 8 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 6 with vascular dementia.

While they were giving the test, they noted the “incidence and severity” of the “head-turning sign” (HTS) — whether the patient turned his/her head to look at the caregiver for help.  They were trying to determine if this “sign” is unique to (specific to) Alzheimer’s Disease.

They concluded:

“HTS [head-turning sign] can be a clinical marker of AD and aMCI, and may represent a type of excuse behavior as well as a sign of dependency on and trust in the caregivers.”

These sorts of studies seem so hokey to me, particularly given the diagnostic accuracy of all of these dementing disorders.  (Actually, the dementing form of PSP, which is the disease my father had — autopsy-confirmed — has the highest accuracy of these dementias listed.)

You can read the full article online at no charge, if you are interested.  I’ve copied the abstract below.

Robin

————————

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3246279/  –> the full article is available at no charge here

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra. 2011 Jan;1(1):310-7. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

Can the ‘head-turning sign’ be a clinical marker of Alzheimer’s disease?

Fukui T, Yamazaki T, Kinno R.
Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

Abstract
AIMS:
To investigate the incidence and severity of the ‘head-turning sign’ (HTS), i.e. turning the head back to the caregiver(s) for help, in patients with various dementias and discuss its clinical specificity in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

METHODS:
WE INVESTIGATED THE INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF HTS WHILE ADMINISTERING A SHORT COGNITIVE TEST (THE REVISED HASEGAWA DEMENTIA RATING SCALE: HDSR) in outpatients with AD [125 patients, including 4 with AD + vascular dementia (VaD)], 8 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 34 with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 8 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and 6 with VaD.

RESULTS:
Significant differences were found among the 5 disease groups in the incidence and severity of HTS, and HDSR scores. Given the significant differences between AD and DLB in post hoc analyses, patients were dichotomized into AD-related (AD and aMCI) and AD-nonrelated (PSP, DLB and VaD) groups. Both incidence (41 vs. 17%, p = 0.002) and severity of HTS (0.80 ± 1.13 vs. 0.21 ± 0.60, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the AD-related group, while average age and HDSR scores were comparable between both groups. AD-related disease, female gender and low HDSR score contributed significantly to the occurrence and severity of HTS.

CONCLUSIONS:
HTS can be a clinical marker of AD and aMCI, and may represent a type of excuse behavior as well as a sign of dependency on and trust in the caregivers.

PMID: 22203823  (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)