Severe Autonomic Failure “Highly Predictive” of Autopsy-Confirmed MSA

This is an important article as it evaluates the clinical records of 29 patients with autopsy-confirmed multiple system atrophy (MSA) at Mayo Rochester.  All 29 of these patients had received “full autonomic function tests.”

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that several factors are “highly predictive” of autopsy-confirmed MSA:

1- “presence of severe generalised autonomic failure”

2- severe adrenergic failure.  I believe this is found by testing the blood pressure and heart rate response to the Valsalva manoeuvre and headup tilt.

3- severe sudomotor failure and widespread anhidrosis in particular.  Sudomotor failure is determined by the QSART (Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test) and the TST (Thermoregulatory Sweat Test).

4- “rapid progression of autonomic failure”

FOUR PHENOTYPES

Among these 29 patients, there were four phenotypes or clinical presentations for MSA:
* MSA-P:  18 of 29
* MSA-C:  8 of 29
* PAF (Pure Autonomic Failure):  2 of 29
* Parkinson’s Disease-like:  1 of 29

Disease duration was shortest for those with the MSA-P phenotype (5 years ± 1.8 years), and longest for those with the PAF phenotype (13 years ± 4.2 years).  In between were those with the MSA-C phenotype (8 years ± 3.6 years).

We are told that one of the MSA-P cases was an “atypical” case in which a diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration (CBD) — one of the other atypical parkinsonism disorders — was considered.  Due to the “severe generalised autonomic failure,” a diagnosis of MSA-P was made.

In another “atypical” case, PSP was considered due to the patient’s “flexed posture, axial as well as appendicular rigidity, limitation of vertical gaze and hypokinetic dysarthria.”  But “given the clinical features of nocturnal stridor and severe generalised autonomic failure, the most likely diagnosis was considered to be MSA.”  (This patient was put in the MSA-P group.)

Along with lots of other excerpts, I’ve copied the stories of all of the atypical cases.  The few of you who fall into that MSA-vs-PSP-vs-CBD category will want to read those stories.  You can really appreciate the challenge for the neurologist in making the clinical diagnosis.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

Some patients had brain MRIs completed.  “Cerebellar atrophy was the most common finding (10/16 patients) and the hot cross bun sign was present in two patients.”

The authors provided these two “clinical red flags” — rapid progression and early postural instability:

* “Rapid progression was characteristic, with gait impairment being present at motor onset in 75% of cases; 93% of patients progressed from motor onset to wheelchair dependency within 5 years.”

* “Another characteristic was early postural instability with mean time to first fall of 21±17 months. Retropulsion on the Pull Test was positive in 92% of patients when it was done at 21±18 months from onset of symptoms.”

Here’s what the authors said about parkinsonian symptoms:

* “A rest tremor was uncommon, being present in 10% of patients.”

* “Levodopa responsiveness was poor or poorly sustained in 80%.”

* “Symmetric motor involvement was the rule; symmetric bradykinesia in 78% and rigidity in 80%.”

I hope this is the first of many papers we see out of Mayo on clinical-pathological correlations in MSA.

The abstract is copied below.

Robin

———————–

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 6. [Epub ahead of print]

Autopsy confirmed multiple system atrophy cases: Mayo experience and role of autonomic function tests.

Iodice V, Lipp A, Ahlskog JE, Sandroni P, Fealey RD, Parisi JE, Matsumoto JY, Benarroch EE, Kimpinski K, Singer W, Gehrking TL, Gehrking JA, Sletten DM, Schmeichel AM, Bower JH, Gilman S, Figueroa J, Low PA.
Neurovascular and Autonomic Medicine Unit, Imperial College London, UK.

Abstract
Background
Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a sporadic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by autonomic failure, manifested as orthostatic hypotension or urogenital dysfunction, with combinations of parkinsonism that is poorly responsive to levodopa, cerebellar ataxia and corticospinal dysfunction.

Published autopsy confirmed cases have provided reasonable neurological characterisation but have lacked adequate autonomic function testing.

Objectives
To retrospectively evaluate if the autonomic characterisation of MSA is accurate in autopsy confirmed MSA and if consensus criteria are validated by autopsy confirmation.

Methods
29 autopsy confirmed cases of MSA evaluated at the Mayo Clinic who had undergone formalised autonomic testing, including adrenergic, sudomotor and cardiovagal functions and Thermoregulatory Sweat Test (TST), from which the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) was derived, were included in the study.

Results
Patient characteristics: 17 men, 12 women; age of onset 57±8.1 years; disease duration to death 6.5±3.3 years; first symptom autonomic in 18, parkinsonism in seven and cerebellar in two.

Clinical phenotype at first visit was MSA-P (predominant parkinsonism) in 18, MSA-C (predominant cerebellar involvement) in eight, pure autonomic failure in two and Parkinson’s disease in one.

Clinical diagnosis at last visit was MSA for 28 cases.

Autonomic failure was severe: CASS was 7.2±2.3 (maximum 10).

TST% was 65.6±33.9% and exceeded 30% in 82% of patients. The most common pattern was global anhidrosis.

Norepinephrine was normal supine (203.6±112.7) but orthostatic increment of 33.5±23.2% was reduced.

Four clinical features (rapid progression, early postural instability, poor levodopa responsiveness and symmetric involvement) were common.

Conclusion
The pattern of severe and progressive generalised autonomic failure with severe adrenergic and sudomotor failure combined with the clinical phenotype is highly predictive of MSA.

PubMed ID#:  22228725  (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)

DLB Patients Don’t Turn Their Heads to the Caregiver?

In this Japanese study, researchers gave a short cognitive test to patients with several types of dementia — 125 with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), 4 with AD plus vascular dementia, 8 with amnestic MCI (mild cognitive impairment), 34 with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 8 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 6 with vascular dementia.

While they were giving the test, they noted the “incidence and severity” of the “head-turning sign” (HTS) — whether the patient turned his/her head to look at the caregiver for help.  They were trying to determine if this “sign” is unique to (specific to) Alzheimer’s Disease.

They concluded:

“HTS [head-turning sign] can be a clinical marker of AD and aMCI, and may represent a type of excuse behavior as well as a sign of dependency on and trust in the caregivers.”

These sorts of studies seem so hokey to me, particularly given the diagnostic accuracy of all of these dementing disorders.  (Actually, the dementing form of PSP, which is the disease my father had — autopsy-confirmed — has the highest accuracy of these dementias listed.)

You can read the full article online at no charge, if you are interested.  I’ve copied the abstract below.

Robin

————————

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3246279/  –> the full article is available at no charge here

Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra. 2011 Jan;1(1):310-7. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

Can the ‘head-turning sign’ be a clinical marker of Alzheimer’s disease?

Fukui T, Yamazaki T, Kinno R.
Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

Abstract
AIMS:
To investigate the incidence and severity of the ‘head-turning sign’ (HTS), i.e. turning the head back to the caregiver(s) for help, in patients with various dementias and discuss its clinical specificity in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

METHODS:
WE INVESTIGATED THE INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF HTS WHILE ADMINISTERING A SHORT COGNITIVE TEST (THE REVISED HASEGAWA DEMENTIA RATING SCALE: HDSR) in outpatients with AD [125 patients, including 4 with AD + vascular dementia (VaD)], 8 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 34 with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 8 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and 6 with VaD.

RESULTS:
Significant differences were found among the 5 disease groups in the incidence and severity of HTS, and HDSR scores. Given the significant differences between AD and DLB in post hoc analyses, patients were dichotomized into AD-related (AD and aMCI) and AD-nonrelated (PSP, DLB and VaD) groups. Both incidence (41 vs. 17%, p = 0.002) and severity of HTS (0.80 ± 1.13 vs. 0.21 ± 0.60, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the AD-related group, while average age and HDSR scores were comparable between both groups. AD-related disease, female gender and low HDSR score contributed significantly to the occurrence and severity of HTS.

CONCLUSIONS:
HTS can be a clinical marker of AD and aMCI, and may represent a type of excuse behavior as well as a sign of dependency on and trust in the caregivers.

PMID: 22203823  (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)

 

Pregnancy is associated with faster disease progression (MSA)

This is a case report by Washington University (St. Louis) clinicians of a 31-year-old Irish woman who lived in the midwest US with parkinsonism, initially diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease.  She had a baby at age 35.  “Her pregnancy was complicated by severe orthostatic hypotension and motor fluctuations.”  At age 37, she had DBS (deep brain stimulation).  She died eight years after disease onset.  Upon brain autopsy, it was found she had multiple system atrophy (MSA).  The authors conclude that “pregnancy may be associated with marked disease progression.”

I don’t know if the authors considered that the DBS may’ve been associated with “marked disease progression.”  If anyone looks, let me know!

I’ve copied the abstract below.  The full article is available at no charge online.

Also, this must be one of the youngest documentated cases of MSA.

Robin

—————————–

www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/pdf/1752-1947-5-599.pdf  –> full article is available here at no charge

Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2011 Dec 30;5(1):599. [Epub ahead of print]

Pregnancy in multiple system atrophy: a case report.

Zhu L, Cairns NJ, Tabbal SD, Racette BA.

Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Multiple system atrophy is a late, adult-onset alpha-synucleinopathy with no data on the effect of pregnancy on the disease course. Early stage multiple system atrophy can be difficult to distinguish from Parkinson’s disease.

CASE PRESENTATION:
We describe the case of an Irish woman with parkinsonism starting at age 31, initially diagnosed as having dopa-responsive, idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, who successfully delivered a full-term child at age 35. Her pregnancy was complicated by severe orthostatic hypotension and motor fluctuations. Two years post-partum, she underwent bilateral subthalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation for intractable motor fluctuations and disabling dyskinesia. After this treatment course she experienced deterioration of motor symptoms and death eight years after disease onset. Post-mortem neuropathological examination revealed striatonigral degeneration and alpha-synuclein-positive glial cytoplasmic inclusions in brain stem nuclei, basal ganglia and white matter tracts, consistent with a neuropathological diagnosis of multiple system atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS:
Multiple system atrophy can affect women of child-bearing age and pregnancy may be associated with marked disease progression.

PubMed ID#: 22208291  (see pubmed.gov for the abstract only)

Four Markers of Future Neurological Problems

This Italian paper notes that many people develop RBD (REM sleep behavior disorder) and, on average, 25 years later many of them develop a neurological disorder, such as Lewy body dementia (LBD), Parkinson’s Disease (PD), or multiple system atrophy (MSA).  Authors say:

“The estimated 10-year risk of neurodegenerative disease for…RBD is about 40%.” 

Obviously, it would be good to identify who is in that 40% bucket.  The authors indicate that potential markers of neurodegeneration include:

(1) marked EEG slowing on spectral analysis;
(2) decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding and substantia nigra hyperechogenicity;
(3) impaired olfactory function;
(4) impaired color vision.

I was in a meeting once with a neurologist and a local support group member.  The neurologist was reviewing the late husband’s neuropathology report.  I remember the neurologist being very interested in finding the EEGs done on the husband early on as he said that a certain finding on an EEG would’ve been an indicator the husband was going to develop a neurological disorder.”

This is the first time I’ve seen “impaired color vision” as a potential marker.

I’ve copied the abstract of the medical journal article below.

Robin

————————–

Sleep Medicine. 2011 Dec;12 Suppl 2:S43-9.

Does idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) really exist? What are the potential markers of neurodegeneration in iRBD?

Ferini-Strambi L.
Sleep Disorders Center, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Abstract
REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) may be idiopathic or associated with other neurologic disorders. A strong association between RBD and a-synucleinopathies has recently been observed, with the parasomnia often heralding the clinical onset of the neurodegenerative disease. The idiopathic form accounts for up to 60% of the cases reported in the three largest series of patients with RBD. Some clinical follow-up studies revealed that a large proportion of these patients will eventually develop a parkinsonian syndrome or a dementia of the Lewy bodies type in the years following the RBD diagnosis. The estimated 10-year risk of neurodegenerative disease for idiopathic RBD is about 40%. Moreover, it has been reported that the median interval between RBD and subsequent neurologic syndrome is 25years. Several studies have looked at neurophysiologic and neuropsychological functions in idiopathic RBD and have found evidence of CNS dysfunction during both wakefulness and sleep in a variable proportion of these patients, challenging the concept of idiopathic RBD. Identifying subjects with a high risk of developing a neurodegenerative process may be crucial to develop early intervention strategies. Prospective studies in idiopathic RBD showed that potential markers of neurodegeneration include: (1) marked EEG slowing on spectral analysis; (2) decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding and substantia nigra hyperechogenicity; (3) impaired olfactory function; (4) impaired color vision.

PubMed ID#: 22136899  (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)

 

Test cannot differentiate PD and MSA early-on

This is an interesting Swedish study.  As you may know, a test that examines how well the anal sphincter works is a good test to differentiate Parkinson’s Disease from multiple system atrophy (MSA).  According to the abstract of this article, that test only differentiates PD and MSA “many years into the disease.”

In the Swedish study, they examined 148 newly-diagnosed patients — 100 definite PD, 21 probable PD, 16 MSA, 11 progressive supranuclear palsy, and 40 controls.  They gave them all an external anal sphincter electromyography (EAS-EMG) within 3 months of their first visit.  They found:  “No EAS-EMG differences were found between the patient groups, especially not between PD and MSA.”  So they concluded that this test cannot differentiate PD and MSA early in the disease course.

The abstract to the medical journal article is copied below.

Robin

———————————

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2012 Jan 3.  [Epub ahead of print]

Anal sphincter electromyography in patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic parkinsonism.

Linder J, Libelius R, Nordh E, Holmberg B, Stenlund H, Forsgren L.
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
The differential diagnosis of patients with idiopathic parkinsonism is difficult, especially early in the course of the disease. External anal sphincter electromyography (EAS-EMG) has been reported to be of value in the differential diagnosis between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Patients with MSA are reported to have pathological EAS-EMG and patients with PD are reported to have significantly less pathological EAS-EMG results. Comparisons between patients with parkinsonian disorders have usually been made many years into the disease, and thus it is largely unknown if the results of EAS-EMG can be used to distinguish the different diagnoses in the early phase of the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We investigated 148 newly diagnosed patients with idiopathic parkinsonism from a population-based incidence cohort (100 definite PD, 21 probable PD, 16 MSA, 11 progressive supranuclear palsy, and 40 controls) with EAS-EMG within 3 months of their first visit and, in the majority of patients, before start of treatment with dopaminergic drugs. The clinical diagnoses were made using established clinical diagnostic criteria after a median follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS:
All patient groups had more pathological EAS-EMG results than controls. No EAS-EMG differences were found between the patient groups, especially not between PD and MSA.

CONCLUSIONS:
External anal sphincter electromyography examination cannot separate the different parkinsonian subgroups from each other in early course of the diseases.

© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

PubMed ID#: 22211900  (see pubmed.gov for this abstract only)